Showing posts with label left in the dark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label left in the dark. Show all posts

Sunday, June 17, 2012

Tony Wright Interview

KI: Can you give us a brief synopsis of what ‘Left in the Dark’ is about?

Tony Wright: Left in the Dark outlines a radical new interpretation of existing data re the evolution, development and functioning of the human brain. Specifically it proposes that the rapid and accelerating expansion of the human brain during the latter stages of its evolution was due to a feedback mechanism driven by our own hormone system in combination with complex plant bio-chemistry abundant in our evolutionary diet. Due to a change in our environment/ecology and the associated loss of the key plant chemicals the expansion of our brain stalled and its structure changed detrimentally, affecting our perception, psychology, behaviour and the societies we have created. Simplistically our perception is directly affected by the structure and bio-chemistry of our brain and this has changed out of all recognition in a relatively short time. I have also proposed that the condition was known to our distant ancestors and their attempts to describe and treat it can be recognised in oral tradition and mythology as well as 'religious' practice.


It will be, it must be, taken very seriously in any discussion of human origins.
Prof. Colin Groves (ANU)

KI: What are the main differences in function between the left and right brain hemispheres?

Tony Wright: The orthodox perspective suggests each hemisphere has its own specialisation and the characteristics of the dominant (left hemisphere) give us our unique and advanced abilities i.e. conceptual and rational thought processes and speech etc. My proposal is that the development of the brain and in particular one side of the neo-cortex is now incomplete; paradoxically the most retarded side has assumed control. This has severely limited our perception and compromised many abilities yet many of those abilities as well as a wholly different perception lie dormant in the right side of our brain, only occasionally glimpsed by a tiny minority. This also creates a paradox whereby the dominant side of the brain is assessing itself so while the concept of specialist abilities appears initially to make some sense on further investigation all is not as it appears. I have proposed that the abilities and perception facilitated by the left side of our brain are greatly reduced or distorted versions of what still remains locked away in the right.


Left in the Dark offers a provocative and original answer to the most important question of our time."
Linda Buzzell-Saltzman (IAE)

KI: How can the right hemisphere be accessed and what are some of the benefits we could enjoy by minimizing the influence of the left hemisphere?

Tony Wright: I have proposed that the origins of religious or mystic practice and technique were borne out of attempts to reduce the influence of the degenerating left and / or engage the slowly failing abilities of the increasingly inhibited right. Techniques that combined minimising the left while simultaneously engaging the right were most effective though these more powerful approaches have become diluted or lost as the condition has worsened. Ultimately these approaches failed; however it is possible to make sense of the relic practices that survive when considered within the context of treating cerebral dominance as the symptom of a neurodegenerative condition rather than an advanced adaptive trait. So reducing the effects of the left would include disengaging it from its limited abilities i.e. not talking or thinking in a conceptual manner, tiring it out so its ability to dominate is reduced. Engaging the right would included singing, complex flowing movement/dance, imagination (i.e. thinking in pictures), or judicious supplementation of neurochemistry to ameliorate underlying deficiency. The left hemispheres damage has created a psychology of fear and this drives us in much of our lives, so removing the underlying fear is in its self one of the biggest rewards on offer. The profound sense of escape or liberation described by those who have experienced a window with a reduction in the influence of the left defies explanation.


This courageous book deserves careful critical attention.
Prof. Ashok Gangadean (G D I)

KI: You talk about humankind’s prior consumption of fruit a lot in your book. Exactly why do you consider fruit to be a vital component in the evolution of mankind?

Tony Wright: The key components in fruit are the chemicals that give fruit its colour, many of which happen to be hormonally or neurochemically active. This is relevant to the real time functioning of the brain. However these effects are of much greater significance during the early development of the brain. Fruit is generally a 'free lunch', easy to digest and rich in simple sugars (rocket fuel for the brain). The possibility that humans became near specialist fruit eaters solves a lot of physiological enigmas without having to cobble together complicated theories based on hostile environments that have never produced such a large or complex brain for such a small species.


It adds a whole new dimension to the task of defining 'normal' behaviour.
Tim Smit (The Eden Project)

KI: How about steroids? What are they and how do they impact us?

Tony Wright: Steroids are an extremely important class of hormones that include the sex hormones testosterone and oestrogen's. They are essential in all stages of our growth and development as they are part of the mechanism that reads the DNA code. For example we all start off more or less female and it is primarily the influence of steroids that dictates our sexual characteristics. The level, ratio or activity of these hormones is sufficient to radically alter all aspects of our development and function. Another example, if a mature male takes sufficient oestrogen he will develop breasts. There is no change in the DNA code just a change in the way it is read. Apply these structural effects to the hormonally sensitive brain during its early development and it is clear that a change in steroid activity will impact on brain development and its permanent/lifelong function. Alter steroid levels or activity and you effectively change the DNA code.


A revolutionary view of human evolution.
Dr Michael Winkleman (ASU)

KI: If it is true that left hemisphere dominance is limiting our consciousness, what are we missing out on? How would our experience of the world change if we had greater access to the right hemisphere?

Tony Wright: Aside from a whole raft of prodigy or savant like abilities that are now considered extremely rare our psychology would be radically different; we would all feel a strength of connection and empathy to each other that is now only typical of how most parents regard their young children. In other words our ability to harm each other is not about making inappropriate choices it is a symptom of neurological damage. Repair the damage and the potential to cause harm is no longer possible. That possibility alone is what has driven me for the last 15 years or so.


A truly amazing book
Prof. Robert Greenway (SSU)

KI: Can you briefly define confabulation and explain the impact this has on our lives and how it is related to left hemisphere dominance?

Tony Wright: I copied this from Wikipedia.....

Confabulation is the formation of false memories, perceptions, or beliefs about the self or the environment as a result of neurological or psychological dysfunction.

This term is generally applied to specific conditions, however the orthodox neurological/psychological literature is full of examples that appears to accept confabulation in one guise or another as the normal mode of functioning for the dominant left hemisphere. Simplistically it seems to be accepted that the left hemisphere does not experience reality directly and instead it contrives an approximation. This is considered beneficial, yet it is also accepted that the right hemisphere perceives reality directly. Of course these are rational or left brain concepts to explain the data. Perhaps not surprisingly this paradox has escaped serious attention and the explanations that do exist seem a little confabulated! I have proposed that this is a serious symptom of our condition that in its extreme form explains a lot of the obvious insanity that goes for normality. It also ties in with many traditions that speak of humanity's separation from our real sense of who we are and our historic drift into an all encompassing state of delusion.


This is a startling book that makes us rethink the most fundamental issues of religion, psychology, and philosophy.
Richard Heinberg (Post Carbon Institute)

KI: Based on your research and understanding, what are some practical steps we can all take to improve the quality of our lives?

Tony Wright: I would suggest a number of steps that will at least begin to potentiate the latent abilities locked away in everyone.

* Moving towards a nutrient dense raw diet. This is really about improving the construction materials and bio-chemistry of the most complex thing we know. A bit of an engineering no-brainer (you would think)! Basically attempting to re-create the highly complex structural and biochemical regime that fueled tens of millions of years of neural evolution and development that eventually resulted in the rapid expansion of our brain and its acquisition of ever more complex/advanced abilities. Not so different to restoring a neglected hand-built Italian sports car; using anything less than the best quality parts and fuel would be unthinkable and would result in compromised performance. Yet apply the same basic philosophy to the human brain (infinitely more precise in its basic design) and apparently different rules apply. It is considered okay to build and run it from the poorest quality materials that were never part of its original development, the presumption being that it makes little difference.

Just to confuse matters, the structural distortion that occurs at a sub cellular level during foetal development is now by far and away the most significant limiting factor when it comes to left hemisphere perception and general function. This in turn appears to give support to the idea that the quality of the construction materials and fuels has minimal effect on how our brain works. This is effectively true for the left hemisphere, running it on the highest quality bio-chemistry or the worst quality junk will make little difference as neither regime will make much impact on the developmental damage. It will however affect the potential of the right hemisphere, as it still retains much of its structural integrity and requires the highest quality materials to fully engage. For most of us this is not much of an issue as we rarely escape the structurally distorted limits of the left hemisphere and if we do even the sub conscious glimmerings of the dormant right hemisphere self can still be mind blowing relative to our normal self. Only by fully retrofitting the essential biochemical structure and then reducing the influence of the left is it possible to begin engaging the full potential of the right. Of course prior to the onset of the degenerative condition both hemispheres had the same essential requirements and phenomenal capacity and despite the physical separation worked as a seamless whole facilitating a single sense of self that we would currently attempt to describe in profound superlatives.

* Combining a number of traditional practices that enhance right brain function while simultaneously reducing the influence of the left. So some form of meditation, extended periods of reduced speech, or if you have the nerve sing your necessary dialogue! Listen to complex flowing music; the left brain cannot hear the irregular patterns and while it may become irritated or indifferent with time the right steps in and suddenly you can hear what the composer or artist intended. (Perhaps a bit like staring a the once popular 3D Magic Eye images, the ‘hidden’ image or information is there yet most people do not perceive it immediately no matter how hard they look. Then just when you give up it can apparently emerge as if from nowhere and whole new way of perceiving exactly the same information kicks in). Dancing or, more accurately, relaxing and allowing your body to move (apparently of its own accord) to the same kind of flowing music. The sense of your body beginning to move by itself is the conclusion of the dominant left; in reality it is simply signs of your right hemisphere beginning to stir.

* Sleep deprivation. This traditional technique is something I have experimented with for many years and it appears to be a powerful means of reducing the effects of the left. It may exploit the innate weakness of the left side of the brain as if its ‘batteries’ can no longer hold much charge, stay awake and its batteries run down much quicker than the right side. This inevitably leads to increased dysfunction, a sense of tiredness, irritability and clumsiness etc. However its ability to stay in charge is also reduced and with practice and appropriate preparation it appears possible to induce a temporary and partial shift in dominance with glimpses of enhanced perception. However it is not without some risk so I would generally suggest no more than a gentle experimental reduction in sleep if it causes no problems.

The relics of prolonged sleep deprivation as an ancient technique survive in various writings such as the Epic of Gilgamesh as well as in vision quest, trance dance and in more diluted forms as intentionally breaking ones sleep to meditate or pray. Spending part of an occasional night in meditation possibly with friends is perhaps a safe option if one is not required to drive etc. the following day (i.e. no more than a nights partying while singing or dancing to music). Of course there is the risk of it being fun, something the left tends to frown on.

About Tony Wright

Tony Wright is the originator of the startling theory outlined in his book Left in the Dark. In this book Tony Wright argues that humankind is suffering from an inherited and progressive neuro-degenerative condition that has led to one side of our brain being perceptually and functionally limited. Tony Wright has himself engaged in various activities to test his theory, including extended periods of sleep deprivation, intended to lessen left hemisphere (controlling) activity and heighten access to the right (more redundant) hemisphere.

Tony Wright's work is of particular interest to martial artists seeking a more spiritual dimension to their training as it relates directly to right-hemisphere experiences that can be discovered through meditation. Tony Wright also offers original interpretations of such classic texts as the Tao Te Ch'ing.

You can learn more about Tony Wright and his work by visiting his site at http://leftinthedark.org.uk/. You can read a review of Tony Wright's book here.

Return to the top of Tony Wright Interview.

Left in the Dark Review

Left in the Dark by Tony Wright and Graham Gynn is one of those books. It’s the kind of book that raises so many questions you could easily spend the rest of your life trying to find the answers. The basic premise is that through the centuries mankind has suffered a divided brain with the left hemisphere being more commanding than the right hemisphere; and this degeneration has been to our detriment as a species. Our ‘fall from Grace’ is a real but neuro-chemical event that continues to this day and one that has cost us our true sanity and confused our perception of the world and our place in it.

In reviewing Left in the Dark I couldn’t help but read through it twice, savoring each and every sentence as food for thought. Rarely have I read as thought-provoking a book as this one and in the time since my first reading I have begun re-examining my areas of interest (East Asian philosophy and spiritualism and the connections to meditative and martial disciplines). My mind has come alive with new possible interpretations of old material and it was because of this book that I switched to a raw food diet as, in large part, the authors argue that our slow inter-generational retardation has been caused in the first place by the change in our diet from a primarily fruit-based one (along with vegetables and nuts) to a meat-based (the hunter gatherers) and finally a crop-based food supply (supplemented with meat from domesticated animals bred for slaughter). (Note: I was on a raw food diet for about 6 months and stopped primarily because it was inconvenient).

The evidence presented is both sweeping and convincing. I am far more qualified to speak of the anthropological evidence presented and this is what most interested me on the first reading but the material related to neuro-science makes complete sense to me and is easy to read and digest for a non-scientist. There is so much to get out of each chapter and each section with each chapter that follow-up work is begging to be done. Hopefully we will see more from Tony Wright (the originator of the theory) in the future.

What is especially refreshing is that Left in the Dark offers possible solutions to the problem it presents. It is not a doom-and-gloom book damning mankind to perpetual left hemisphere dominant delusion and dissatisfaction. Rather, various recent experiments are detailed that suggest the dominance of the left hemisphere may be lessened and the activity of the right hemisphere enhanced, along with pointers that an individual may take immediately to at least make an experience of right hemisphere dominance more likely (such as following a raw food diet). Although this kind of work is still in its infancy, it is clear that some progress at least is being made and for those interested in taking the theory further there are some clear steps outlined.

Overall I rate Left in the Dark as one of the most thought-provoking books that I have read. It will appeal to a wide variety of people for different reasons initially but I am confident that upon completing it, the reader will have had his or her interest in a cross-selection of disciplines piqued. A definite must read!

Return to the top of Left in the Dark Review.

Left in the Dark

Left in the Dark by Tony Wright is one of two books that I have read in the last year that has impacted my life, my way of thinking and my teaching of the Way of the Enlightened Zen Warrior in an enormous way. My first exposure to the book was through an interview with author Tony Wright and a review of the book.

Since then I have devoted more and more time to researching the shared, broad central thesis of both The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind: that the human race has experienced a profound neurological shift in its dominant brain hemisphere from right to left causing a massive shift in consciousness that is continuing and being reinforced today. The effects of this are many but not so varied. Essentially this shift in dominant brain hemisphere has caused a crisis in our ability to contact and experience ‘the divine’, has led to us losing a sense of our inner guide or our inner voice, has stifled our emotional development and has caused a decline in various motor skills that would be otherwise enhanced if the left hemisphere was less controlling.

Although The Origin of Consciousness was written at an earlier date it covers a more recent period and begins its investigation with an analysis of the Greek classics. Left in the Dark searches much further into our past to trace the exact origins of this shift in brain hemisphere dominance.

The basic premise of Left in the Dark is that thousand and thousands of years ago our neo-cortex functioned as a single consciousness system with no differentiation between areas of specialization neurologists now identify as existing between our left and right brain hemispheres. Effectively we existed as a species of animal. Culture and technology in even the most rudimentary forms did not exist and could not exist at this stage of our evolution. Then, somehow and in someway, our brains suffered damage and the origins of a distinction in function between the two brain hemispheres was initiated. This damage may have arisen primarily from an altered level of testosterone and this damage was therefore suffered more acutely by males (who produce more testosterone). Of further important note is that the damage done to the brain was not equal: the left hemisphere suffered more severely during this period. At this time though our living conditions in tropical rain forests granted us access to wide varieties of fruits (and plants, but fruits in particular) and the chemicals within those fruits suppressed interference from the more-damaged left hemisphere and allowed the right hemisphere to thrive. To put it more simply, at this stage in our evolution our right brain hemisphere was dominant.

Left in the Dark traces the shift from right hemisphere to left hemisphere dominance back some 200,000 years to a time when humans left the tropical rain forests and, more importantly, the fruit-based diets we were following at the time. Up until this point our brains were developing neurologically from generation to generation both in size and functional ability due to a biochemical positive feedback loop that inhibited certain steroids which in turn suppressed left hemisphere dominance. This loop was created by our fruit-based diet and grounded from our very inception in the womb of a mother awash with the chemicals provided by fruits. When our ancestors left the tropical rain forests our diet changed immediately and, with less fruit in particular being eaten, certain steroids were no longer inhibited and this initiated a decline in the use of our right brain hemisphere and a shift to left hemisphere control, a condition that is prevalent and continually reinforced today.

Left in the Dark notes that the result of this split was the emergence of two different senses of the self, the one arising from the left hemisphere and the other from the right hemisphere. Unfortunately these two selves could not easily co-exist and, as the left hemisphere became more and more dominant through time, it began to suppress the perceptions provided by the right hemisphere. Part of this historical shift in consciousness is covered in great detail in The Origin of Consciousness over a period of a several hundred years. More and more human consciousness became a continuous internal left-hemisphere monologue arising from stress and anxiety caused by a feeling of the loss of wholeness both within the self and with wider society, difficulty in connecting to ‘the divine’, stifled emotions and a reliance on external authorities for guidance. It is also from this period that the overall size of our brains began to shrink (after growing at an unprecedented pace), a fact that continues to haunt us today. It has been estimated that our brain size may have decreased by as much as 5% over the last 10,000 years. Popularly our brains are considered to be in a state of evolution and the development of high technology would seem to support this. But this increased ability to create and use technology has come at the cost of a very obvious decline in our awareness of and contact with the numinous. Science and rationality have not simply destroyed God, they have further stifled the consciousness arising from the right hemisphere and inhibited our ability – even our very desire – to commune with the divine; and those that seek communion suffer frustration in their efforts. So what I would suggest is that while our left hemispheres does in fact continue to become more adept at using technology and solving the problems of technology the overall net effect has been a devolution. While our left hemispheres may have become more complex our right hemispheres have declined in usage and ability to function at a disproportionate pace leading to an overall net decline in brain capacity and function.

So what we are left with today, all these millennium later, is a damaged brain that has forever cut us off from our animal-like existence of yesteryear. Left in the Dark argues that this brain no longer functions as a single unit producing an undifferentiated consciousness but instead generates two forms of often contrasting consciousnesses with the more ‘rational’ and conceptual left hemisphere claiming dominance over the more intuitive and beyond-conceptual right hemisphere. One of the biggest problems that faces us however is that it is this very left hemisphere that suffered the greatest damage when out testosterone level increased and caused the initial left-right hemispherical split. We are living our lives using damaged goods.

Of particular interest and relevance to me is Tony Wright’s recognition that this split into two consciousnesses and the subsequent decline in ability to fully access the consciousness found in our right hemisphere has been described in numerous ancient religious texts as mankind’s ‘fall from grace’. It is this investigation that has consumed my time and attention more and more over the last year as it is central to both my chosen lifestyle and my philosophy of the Way of the Enlightened Zen Warrior. Through my exposure to Japanese martial arts in particular and the philosophies of Zen, Taoism and Confucianism I had become aware of how to contact the right hemisphere and – importantly – how to integrate that fresh (right hemisphere) consciousness into my everyday life; a life that was primarily designed by and for people whose consciousness was forcefully guided by their left hemisphere. Left in the Dark has given me a fresh perspective and a new vocabulary that is less mystical and which allows me to further my understanding and ability to teach people how to live a holistic lifestyle of happiness. Left in the Dark then serves as a fundamental observation and theory in my life philosophy of the Way of the Enlightened Zen Warrior and I will be referring back to this article extensively in the future.

To learn more about Tony Wright and the central thesis of Left in the Dark visit Tony's website.

Return to the top of Left in the Dark.